← Back to Home
🧪

Jan 2025 • 8 min read

Testing LLM Applications: Best Practices for 2025

Comprehensive strategies for testing, evaluating, and ensuring reliability in production LLM applications.

Why LLM Testing Matters

Comprehensive LLM testing is no longer optional—it's essential. The MIT team found that structured, rigorous testing can boost model accuracy by 600%. Rigorous testing practices help teams build more reliable, efficient, and ethical AI systems by ensuring factual correctness and mitigating hallucinations while enhancing security and fairness.

Key Testing Methodologies

Key testing methodologies include unit testing, functional testing, security testing, and regression testing to assess different aspects of LLM reliability.

Unit Testing

Unit testing involves testing the smallest testable parts of an application, which for LLMs means evaluating an LLM response for a given input, based on some clearly defined criteria.

Critical Testing Areas

Hallucination Detection

One of the biggest risks with LLMs is generating misinformation, also known as hallucination testing, where a model fabricates details that seem plausible but are incorrect.

Test systematically for factual accuracy, especially in domains where precision matters.

Security & Safety

Monitoring LLM application inputs and outputs for security and safety breaches is paramount. Evaluations in pre-production test how applications respond to attempts to elicit biased or inappropriate responses.

In post-production, use these evaluations to flag toxicity and track prompt injection attack attempts.

RAG-Specific Testing

Faithfulness evaluations use a secondary LLM to test whether an LLM application's response can be logically inferred from the context used to create it.

A response is considered faithful if all its claims can be supported by the retrieved context.

Best Practices for 2025

Test Edge Cases

Testing edge cases helps detect failure modes that won't show up in typical usage. Test with:

  • Very long inputs (context window limits)
  • Ambiguous queries
  • Contradictory instructions
  • Domain-specific jargon
  • Multiple languages

Leverage Robust Metrics

Use quantitative evaluation metrics for accuracy, hallucinations, and fairness. Don't rely solely on subjective assessment.

Automate Testing

Integrate LLM tests into CI/CD pipelines. Run automated test suites on every deployment to catch regressions early.

Monitor Performance Over Time

Track model degradation by continuously evaluating performance metrics. Models can degrade as data distributions shift or providers update base models.

Audit Bias and Fairness

Regularly audit for bias, toxicity, and fairness in outputs. Test across demographic groups and sensitive topics.

Offline vs Online Testing

Effective LLM evaluation usually blends offline (development/test) and online (production) methods, each catching different types of errors and insights.

Offline Testing

Pre-deployment evaluation using test datasets:

  • Faster iteration cycles
  • Controlled test conditions
  • Cheaper (no production traffic)
  • May miss real-world edge cases

Online Testing

Production monitoring with real user traffic:

  • Catches real-world issues
  • Detects distribution shifts
  • User feedback integration
  • Requires robust monitoring infrastructure

Testing Strategy

You can't test without a clear and specific goal. Deploy tests with a specific goal and scope in mind. Don't try to test accuracy, fairness, and security all at once as this will give you a poor idea of any individual component.

Focused Test Suites

Create separate test suites for different concerns:

  • Accuracy Suite: Factual correctness and hallucination detection
  • Safety Suite: Toxicity, bias, and harmful content
  • Security Suite: Prompt injection, jailbreaking attempts
  • Performance Suite: Latency, throughput, cost

Popular Tools & Frameworks

DeepEval

DeepEval turns LLM evaluations into Pytest-style unit tests and offers 14+ metrics for RAG, bias, hallucination, and fine-tuning. Integrates seamlessly with existing Python test infrastructure.

Langfuse

Experiment tracking and observability platform for LLMs. Track prompt versions, compare model performance, and analyze user interactions.

Datadog

Production monitoring with LLM-specific features including hallucination detection, cost tracking, and latency analysis.

LangSmith

LangChain's debugging platform providing tracing, testing, and evaluation capabilities specifically designed for LangChain applications.

Common Testing Metrics

MetricWhat It Measures
AccuracyCorrectness of factual claims
Hallucination RateFrequency of fabricated information
FaithfulnessGrounding in provided context (RAG)
RelevanceOn-topic and helpful responses
ToxicityHarmful or offensive content
LatencyResponse time (p50, p95, p99)

Implementing Continuous Testing

1. Build Test Datasets

Create golden datasets representing your use case. Include edge cases, common queries, and known failure modes.

2. Define Success Criteria

Set clear thresholds: "Accuracy must be >95%", "Hallucination rate <2%", "P95 latency <2s". Make pass/fail objective.

3. Automate Evaluation

Run tests automatically on every deployment. Block deployments that fail critical tests.

4. Monitor in Production

Sample production traffic for continuous evaluation. Alert when metrics degrade beyond thresholds.

5. Iterate Based on Findings

When tests reveal issues, add those cases to your test suite. Your test coverage grows with every bug found.

The Bottom Line

Testing LLM applications is fundamentally different from testing traditional software. Non-determinism, subjective quality criteria, and emerging failure modes require new approaches.

The teams building the most reliable LLM applications treat testing as a first-class concern, not an afterthought. They invest in comprehensive test suites, automated evaluation, production monitoring, and continuous improvement.

Start simple: pick one metric that matters most, build a small test suite, and iterate from there. Testing LLMs is hard, but the alternative—deploying unreliable AI to production—is much worse.

This article was generated with the assistance of AI technology and reviewed for accuracy and relevance.