Jan 2025 • 8 min read
RAG with LangChain: Building Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Comprehensive guide to implementing RAG pipelines with LangChain for grounding LLM responses in your own data.
What is RAG?
RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) is a technique for augmenting LLM knowledge with additional data. It involves bringing appropriate information from your data sources and inserting it into the model prompt, allowing the LLM to generate responses grounded in your specific documents, databases, or knowledge bases.
RAG has emerged as a popular mechanism to expand an LLM's knowledge base without fine-tuning. Documents retrieved from an external data source ground the LLM generation via in-context learning, enabling accurate answers about your proprietary data.
RAG Architecture: Two Main Components
1. Indexing (Data Pipeline)
A pipeline for ingesting data from a source and indexing it. This typically happens offline before user queries begin.
- Load documents from various sources
- Split documents into chunks
- Generate embeddings for each chunk
- Store embeddings in a vector database
2. Retrieval and Generation
The actual RAG chain that takes user queries and retrieves relevant data to augment generation.
- Receive user query
- Generate embedding for query
- Retrieve relevant chunks from vector DB
- Format retrieved context with query
- Generate answer using LLM
Simple RAG in 40 Lines
The official LangChain tutorial demonstrates that you can create a simple indexing pipeline and RAG chain in approximately 40 lines of code. This makes RAG accessible even for beginners.
Basic Implementation Pattern
A typical basic implementation uses:
- An OpenAI LLM for generation
- A vector database like Weaviate or Pinecone for storage
- OpenAI embeddings for vectorization
- LangChain for orchestration
RAG Implementation Approaches
Approach 1: RAG Agent with Tools
The official LangChain tutorial recommends a RAG agent that executes searches with a simple tool as a good general-purpose implementation. The agent can:
- Decide when to retrieve information
- Refine queries based on initial results
- Perform multiple retrievals if needed
- Reason about which chunks are most relevant
This approach provides flexibility but requires more LLM calls, increasing latency and cost.
Approach 2: Two-Step RAG Chain
A two-step RAG chain uses just a single LLM call per query, which is fast and effective for simple queries. This approach:
- Retrieves relevant documents immediately
- Formats context with the query
- Generates answer in one LLM call
- Minimizes latency and cost
Best for straightforward question-answering over documents.
Advanced RAG Techniques
Parent Document Retriever
Advanced RAG uses techniques like Parent Document Retriever, which creates small and more accurate embeddings while retaining the contextual meaning of large documents. This solves a key RAG challenge:
- Small chunks: Better retrieval precision, but may lack context
- Large chunks: More context, but worse retrieval precision
- Parent Document Retriever: Retrieve with small chunks, return parent documents with full context
Hybrid Search
Combine semantic search (vector similarity) with keyword search (BM25) for best results. Many vector databases now support hybrid search natively.
Reranking
Retrieve more candidates than you need, then use a reranker model to select the most relevant ones. Dramatically improves quality with minimal latency increase.
Key Components in LangChain
Document Loaders
LangChain provides 100+ document loaders for PDFs, websites, databases, APIs, and more. Load data from virtually any source.
Text Splitters
Chunk documents intelligently. LangChain offers recursive character splitting, semantic splitting, and language-specific splitters that respect code structure.
Embeddings
Support for OpenAI, Cohere, HuggingFace, and open-source embedding models. Choose based on your quality, cost, and privacy requirements.
Vector Stores
Integrations with 50+ vector databases including Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, ChromaDB, and more. Start with a local database for development, migrate to hosted for production.
Retrievers
Various retrieval strategies beyond simple similarity search: MMR (Maximum Marginal Relevance), similarity score threshold, and custom retrievers.
Production Best Practices
Chunk Size Optimization
Experiment with different chunk sizes. Common starting points are 500-1000 characters with 50-100 character overlap. Test with your specific data and queries.
Metadata Filtering
Store metadata (date, author, source, category) with chunks. Filter before semantic search to narrow the search space and improve relevance.
Query Transformation
Rewrite user queries before retrieval. Convert questions to statements, expand acronyms, or generate multiple query variations for better recall.
Cite Sources
Always return source documents with answers. Include page numbers, URLs, or document IDs so users can verify information.
Monitor and Iterate
Use LangSmith to trace RAG pipelines. Track which documents are retrieved, how often queries find no results, and user satisfaction. Continuously refine based on real usage.
Common Pitfalls
Pitfall: Chunks Too Small
Result: Retrieved chunks lack context for the LLM to generate good answers. Increase chunk size or use Parent Document Retriever.
Pitfall: No Relevance Threshold
Result: Irrelevant documents always returned. Set a similarity threshold and handle no-results gracefully.
Pitfall: Ignoring Document Freshness
Result: Stale information in responses. Implement incremental indexing and boost recent documents in retrieval.
Sources
This article was generated with the assistance of AI technology and reviewed for accuracy and relevance.